example job description
Reader Interactions
Improve The Existing Job Description To Make It Perfect
Improve the existing job description is part-8 of an interview from Stefan from Germany, who lives the Four Hour Work Week lifestyle in Thailand.
Click here to read part 7 – Real life experiences about outsourcing to the Philippines.
Summary:
- It’s important that you post your job ad under the most relevant category – This will help you to prevent a lot of irrelevant and nonserious applicants.
- In oDesk, you can also search applicants by their skill and then invite them for the interview.
- Ask all candidates for the ‘Sunshine test’ and this will really help you to improve the existing job description.
Start of the Interview:
Francis:
Talking about your job description, we talked about the budget. Let’s go through to improve the existing job description itself.
Stefan:
Yes.
Francis:
If that’s okay with you, Stefan.
Stefan:
Yeah, it’s okay.
Francis:
Okay. You are quite specific about what you want especially that you need it to be re-drawn. You could highlight more that the person should have skills with hand drawing.
Stefan:
I didn’t know if I want it hand drawn because I knew also that this is time consuming.
Francis:
Yes, I agree.
Stefan:
So I didn’t think that this is necessarily the only way that we can go.
Francis:
Okay.
Stefan:
So I could have added that part like in brackets like vectographics style, black and white or hand drawn style. Maybe that’s the way to do it really light. Absolutely.
Francis:
Okay. And we have to work out a style that suits this E-book. So you could emphasize that the first work, as you say, is finding the right solution on how to represent the graphics and then its work.
And then, repeat the process for each other picture. So that the outsourcer knows, who applies, well first it will be research and then it will work.
Some people are looking for work. Not everyone wants to be a problem solver.
Stefan:
Yes.
Francis:
Most people want to work.
Stefan:
Yes.
Francis:
When you say the E-book has to be finalized in a consistent way, I think I understand what you mean; an applicant probably not.
Stefan:
Okay.
Francis:
To improve the existing job description, you could emphasize that you say, “I am looking for a finalized E-book product with cover, layout format, writing font, picture placement, picture subtitles, etc…so really layout what you want.
We only talked about the columns so that could be one item. As I said, the budget will not be sufficient for 50 pictures in 60 pages but I think I got this point across already.
Aside of which, you posted the job in to the area of…let me see…
Stefan:
Design and Multimedia Illustration.
Francis:
Design and Multimedia illustration…yes. You will find designers in Design and Multimedia. However, designers in general are more expensive. In my experience in working with assistants in the range of $1-7 an hour with $5 and above being expensive for my budget is not with graphic people.
But I know that graphic people are expensive in general. So the amount of people you can find for low budget, ready to do the amount of work you are actually looking for is limited.
So what I propose for you is that you post, if you would post a job, in a broader section; virtual assistants, for example. You will get many spam applications from people you don’t want.
But you might find one person who has some experience with Photoshop and, in general, lots of experience with assistants and who is a good communicator.
A virtual or personal assistant whom you can find in the category of, I think its virtual assistants; categories are administrative support. It’s the primary category. And then it’s personal assistant or other administrative support.
Stefan:
Yes. Good.This will really help to improve the existing job description.
Francis:
And there are just much more people on oDesk in these categories, so you have a bigger chance to find that one diamond in the rough for you project.
Stefan:
How I did it was make it in a non-public job.
Francis:
Okay.
Stefan:
And then I search for people. And I didn’t search in the categories as searched by skills like Photoshop and InDesign, stuff like that.
So I wanted the people to specifically say that they have the skill. Not that they could do it but from themselves on they just say “I have Photoshop skills” as a primary skill of them.
And I still got like hundreds – too many people – to invite.
Francis:
Okay.
Stefan:
So I further narrowed it down to take only people with a lot of work hours and in my price range. And then I came down to like 50 still.
Then I just invited like 20 people and those were extremely specified already into the niche that I wanted the worker to be. So that was my approach.
Francis:
Okay. So it’s my mistake, I had the impression you did not have the enough applicants. But you did have enough applicants so I’d rather have too many.
Stefan:
I did. There were too many that I specified it so much because I didn’t want to do 300 invitations. So I narrowed it down to half like 50 people or 20 people.
The less, the better but there were already filtered by oDesk.
So, yes, that was my approach and I got still bad applications which were surprising because they were all people that have 5-stars and top rankings and top test results which was surprising to me.
Francis:
Yes. It is rather surprising that you think, “Hey, I took time to write this job description; why don’t you read it?”
But on the other hand, if you think like them, they apply to as many jobs as they can in order to land one job.
It’s a numbers game to some of them. Not all of them but some of them.
Stefan:
Until we’re already the best of the best. So, I wonder how they get so good.
So many billed hours and such a good ranking without applying properly which is a little bit confusing but still I got a lot of applications that were discarded immediately.
Francis:
I think it’s good that you went quickly about it to weed out the lesser applications. How did the “Sunshine Test” work for you?
I really liked that you mentioned that one.
Stefan:
Yeah. This is the thing that I learned from you like one and a half years back.
Francis:
Yes, I learned it from someone else so it’s not my credit.
Stefan:
Yeah but still I personally learned it from you. And since I used it that is the best tip to weed out everybody who didn’t read your application.
One applicant brought me an application and he didn’t write “Sunshine”. So I was first that, “Oh, you didn’t read my text.” But you later, like a couple of hours later, he wrote me “Oh, sorry I forgot to mention the word.”
So that was okay because it was an honest mistake.
Francis:
He was lucky you read the whole description. Because, normally, if I specifically make the sunshine test and asked for the word “Sunshine” at the beginning of the application; I will only look at the preview of the interview which shows the first few lines of the interview.
If I don’t see sunshine there and I have many applicants, I will not read all those applications which do not start with “Sunshine”.
Stefan:
I opened all the applications because as I said I already reduced it to like 50 invitations and I allocate like 20 applications.
And from that, in the preview I could see that of this 20 people that applied, around 6-7 were like one-liners where you see that the person only wrote one line or a simple “Okay.”
Like I got an application which was like I invited the person and said, “Please apply to this job.” I was pretty surprised when the person replied “Yes, okay.” That was funny.
Francis:
Yes, he meant it very literally.
Stefan:
Yes.
Francis:
“Yes, I’ll apply.”
Stefan:
“Yes, I’ll apply.” But no I meant like please explain how you think. Did I say like?
Francis:
You should say that.
Stefan:
Yes, yes. Maybe I should have added…
Francis:
“So, I have a job offer which might be very good for your profile, if you think you’re the right person, please explain why you would be the best person and apply correctly.”
Something like that.
Stefan:
Yeah, definitely. I forgot to do that. Around from those 20 applications, 7 were like I was able to discard immediately because they were one-liners and the other 13 were like real applications.
But only around 4 of the 13 mentioned “Sunshine”.
Francis:
So, 4 of the 13 read the whole job description and acted upon it.
Stefan:
Yes.
Francis:
Interesting.
Stefan:
So like maybe 20% of my applicants were even reading the description from already really, really specific criteria to recruit them – to hire them.
Which was, again, a little bit disappointing because I’m always hoping that people put more effort in that because when I do jobs for other people I put more effort into it.
And this is kind of disappointing that other people don’t.
Francis:
Yes. From my personal experience when I was looking for a job, I was starting to put a lot of effort in my applications.
And when I sent them out by the dozens literally and got few, if any response, I got a little bit hardened and bolder with my moves. So I tried to get a little bit faster with my applications.
And in the end I learned, on the hard way, that written applications good or bad are never really a solution. The only thing which helped me get a job were personal contacts.
I went to meetings, to the job fairs and learned to present myself personally and on the phone. And that was much more effective than any written application.
In transferring this experience to online jobbing, I assume that people write tons, if hundreds, of applications and never get even so much as a Thank you.
So they might be not so inspired to write a fully long application for each job offer they would be interested. So sometimes, big is the essence.
Stefan:
Which is real because I can imagine that since I behave like that. A lot of people would appreciate a good application of a person that just wrote and like thought about the job and comes up with a good application.
It doesn’t have to be a specific file of all the skills, it can be short. Short is good but just talk about job.
Talk about your ideas of the job. And, I think, I appreciate that. I hire people that apply like this. So I would imagine, a lot of people would appreciate that.
Francis:
I agree. I completely agree. If I have shortlisted 5 or 50 applicants and all of them have sort of nice applications to my job offer, who have passed the “Sunshine” test for example, has shown some personality; I take the time to interview them.
And if I cannot take them because I cannot hire 5 of them, I will say, “Sorry. I really liked your application.” I will tell them what was good and I will also keep them in mind for possible future jobs.
In the past I had some data analysis and I hired one person and I had 5 interesting other prospects. Sometimes later, I hired one of those 5 applicants.
I went back to them and said, “I really liked our interview that time. Would you be interested in another job?”
So you can make contacts and really give good feedback to the nice people who do good applications. I really think that’s good.
Stefan:
I cannot really understand why people don’t take their time with the application. I mean, a lot of times it isn’t paid back. Maybe in the sum it doesn’t matter.
But I don’t know. I would think that it matters. It brings a better profit for the people that work for you when they apply properly. But that’s just my assumption.
Francis:
It’s not only your assumption, it’s also mine. And I think my virtual assistant will be sharing this point of view.
Luckily, a few virtual assistants are always reading over my shoulder when I write blog posts that are intended for employers and the other way around.
So since this is everything is opened here. Let’s just rest again that as an employer, we really, really appreciate it when an application as a virtual assistant applies with a correct, high quality application.
Stefan:
We’re first to the job. That is specific about the job. It has to be about the job. The person has to show that he thought about the job and how he could handle the job.
If that’s given, I’m willing to hire that person right away. It’s a huge bonus. So, I think, that’s very important.
Francis:
I agree.
So yeah, we talked one and a half hour. I just want to add that it will be interesting. I will share this in the Mastermind group in real time.
How I will progress with this interview will be, you will hold me accountable for it.
I aim to create several blog posts and/or tier pages with them from this interview as a transcript. My transcriptionist will have quite some work to do this.
So please give me and her some time to do this. But I will keep you posted and I hope that this interview will be useful for anyone who takes the time to read it in full.
Stefan:
Yes. Okay.
Francis:
So, thanks very much for agreeing to do this interview, Stefan.
Stefan:
Thank you very much for your help – constructive feedback.
Francis:
It’s my pleasure 🙂
Example Job Description for An Ebook Illustrator and Selection Process
Example job description is part-4 of an interview from Stefan from Germany, who lives the Four Hour Work Week lifestyle in Thailand.
Summary:
- You can also invite virtual assistants that have specific skills directly for an interview instead having them apply for your job.
- It’s a good sign of a candidate if he straight away provides his contact details (e.g. skype name) in the cover letter.
- Always check for copyright details whenever you use any images on your website.
Start of the Interview:
Stefan:
Yes.
Francis:
And we have talked about it before but I can give you feedbacks about your job description if you would like to. But if you have questions first…
Stefan:
Let me just explain first what I’m talking about is. Why I wrote it like that and I wasn’t so sure because my experience with outsourcing is limited.
So in the past when I outsourced the jobs, I just wrote the job – what you have to do – in very simple words. So, somebody that is working with me would understand or I would understand it.
And from that, I search for an outsourcer that would have a good profile – a high quality profile that have a good ranking and whatever and that should possibly able to understand what I mean.
Francis:
Yes.
Stefan:
So by writing it very simple and just put it out there. Then I wrote to you that what you think about it and how could I improve it. From that point, I didn’t want to wait so long until you help me out with your expertise.
I just invited a few people that I found on oDesk that I thought were maybe good. I invited them to the job and I got a couple of applications. A lot of them were crap because they’ve just said, “Okay, I accept.”
That was the whole application. But there was one person in particular that wrote me and explained to me what he wanted to do. He would like to have the job and he also sent me his Skype name right away.
Francis:
That is a very good sign, by the way. That would be a test I would do if I were interested in finding a good applicant. So he is actually a very interesting candidate. Go on, please.
Stefan:
Yeah. I thought that was good right away because I didn’t need to write him back and wait for the message again. So, I just added him on Skype and wrote him.
I wrote him and he was online right away. We chatted a little bit. We exchanged ideas and it was right away a good communication.
We didn’t talk so much right away about the payment and about stuff. We talked about the job and I thought that was also a good sign because a lot of people, most of the time in the past interviews, were like this.
I asked what would you do with this job, what are your idea? …and the person tells me I have experience with that and that and that.
And that is all. It’s just listing the past experience. Not so much like I think that we could do that and we could do that. So I thought that he gave me right away possible solutions for the problem and he listened to my problem in detail.
Then, it was a good sign that he didn’t talk about payment right away at all. We didn’t talk about payment for he worked for me 2 days already. It wasn’t a full time job. It was a – how do you say?
Francis:
A part time job.
Stefan:
Part time job, yeah. Like maybe 1 hour a day, 2 hours a day, maybe with a fixed price offer. And the next day, he sent me a sample of his ideas – of his work. That was really good. I saw that he has a few ideas and that he really had thought about that stuff.
Then we discussed it further and further. The biggest problem about the job wasn’t so much the redesigning of the layout.
The biggest problem that is still on the table with our E-book creation is that we have to redesign the pictures that are in the E-book that will be used in the E-book.
Because I can’t produce pictures from scratch, from zero, so I take copyrighted material from Google image search and I just have to make it non-copyright material.
So, my idea is to just take it and redraw it because if I redraw it, 99% of the copyright problem is gone.
Right? If they are like cartoon styled, totally different style, change the angle of the work and stuff. It’s hand-drawn or something like that. Okay, just some solution.
Francis:
We just want to interject here. Since I’m not a lawyer, I cannot give you legal advice. However in your case, I would double or triple check if hand redrawn picture will keep you safe especially if you give the instructions “Please re-draw by hand” and the results is pretty similar. Then you will be in trouble, perhaps.
Stefan:
No, no. The result doesn’t have to be similar. It mustn’t be similar.
Francis:
It shouldn’t be.
Stefan:
No, it mustn’t be similar. It has to be the same information for the human eye, for the reader, but it doesn’t have to be the same. You know what I mean?
A reader has to get the same value from the picture but a Google reverse search engine doesn’t have to find the original image where it came from. Okay?
Because it’s a medical E-book and the human body is not copyrighted, okay?
Francis:
Yes. I understand.
Stefan:
And so writing a vertebra is not copyrighted in any form – you drawing a vertebra. So it just has to be the same value of the information of the picture.
We tried a few examples. We tried to take the original picture. That was the first idea, take the original picture and make a vector graphic from it.
But that was still too similar – way too similar. It looked the same. The arrangement of the picture was basically the same. It was just a different graphic style.
Google image search is very good to find the original still and that mustn’t be possible. That is the thing that I want from my designer that he draws a picture.
And if I take that picture and put it into image search from Google, I can’t find the original picture where it came from. We have to achieve that.
Francis:
Okay. So, let me take over the conversation again. I think that is possible. But just for food for thought and as a little sidebar, as you said the human body is not copyrighted; please double check.
And if needed, get an assistant to research that for you. Is it possible that some of the pictures you plan to re-draw could be found in the very similar way in the Creative Commons area in the Wikimedia, in Flickr, in other image source which you can use for commercial reasons for free?
Stefan:
No. Not in this quality and especially not in this being so easy to find. There are a lot of different because I don’t know exactly what I’m searching for and if I’m using Google image search to search for.
I have a thousand or many, many pictures that I can choose from. And to search that volume from open sources would take an immense amount of time from my side. More than it would take to use images from a source that I don’t know if copyrighted or not and let them be re-drawn.
That is basically the easiest solution and since we made so much progress in the last days to find a solution to this problem.
I’m confident that this is the way to go because it saves a lot of time from my side. And my time is the most valuable in this whole calculation, you know.
Francis:
Understood. So, the possibility of having someone else does the picture research for you, someone potentially cheaper and just as effective.
This possibility aside, I think your job description is rather effective overall. It still has a few flaws.
Stefan:
Yes.
Francis:
I tried to point them out in our mastermind group which we have which is closed so I won’t link to it. But unfortunately, Google plus deleted somehow my comment when I pressed enter and I didn’t want to write it again.
Leave a Reply